Slowed canonical progress in large fields

Author: vfhm

August undefined, 2024

Webb17 jan. 2024 · Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science The size of scientific fields may impede the rise of new ideas. Examining 1.8 billion citations among 90 million papers across 241 subjects, we find a deluge of papers does not lead to turnover of central ideas in a field, but rather to ossification of canon. Webb28 jan. 2024 · Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science PNAS Here, however, we predict that when the number of papers published each year grows very large, the rapid flow of new papers can force scholarly attention to already well-cited papers and limit attention for less-established papers—even those with novel, useful, and potentially …

PNAS权威研究：论文越多，科学发展越易放缓 - CN-Healthcare

WebbJames A. Evans We argue that paradigmatic progress may be slowed as scientific fields grow large. This assertion is supported by evidence from citation patterns across 251 fields—over 1... Webb27 juli 2024 · When the field grew to 50,000 published papers a year, the top 0.1% captured 3.5% of citations, and the top 1% captured 11.9%. When the field was larger still with 100,000 published papers per year, the top 0.1% received 5.7% of citations within the field and the top 1% received 16.7%. churchill container

Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science

WebbSlowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Chu, Johan S. G. ; Evans, James A. The size of scientific fields may impede the rise of new ideas. Examining 1.8 billion … Webb22 sep. 2024 · Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118, e2024636118. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar; Cordero RJ, de Leon-Rodriguez CM, Alvarado-Torres JK, Rodriguez AR, Casadevall A (2016). Life science’s average publishable unit (APU) has increased over the past two decades. PLoS One 11, e0156983. Webb1 okt. 2024 · Europe PMC is an archive of life sciences journal literature. Search life-sciences literature (41,676,131 articles, preprints and more) devin bush jr 2021

https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2024636118… Slowed canonical progress …

(PDF) Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science

Webb17 feb. 2024 · The massive literature produced is neither relevant to advancement of theories nor practical applications (lower left-hand quadrant of Figure 1 ), but is part of the ‘involution’ in scientific research – generating intense competition among researchers with diminishing returns to society. Figure 1. WebbSlowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. More information and figures will be added here after publication. … churchill container corp shawnee kansasWebb14 feb. 2024 · Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118: e2024636118. - Within top 0.03% of tracked publications in Altmetrics Attention Score (over 1500) - Featured in PNAS’s Front Matter Johan S. G. Chu. 2024. churchill container cups

"Webb23 feb. 2024 · The recent paper in PNAS by Chu and Evans (1), “Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science,” questions the maxim “more is better” when investing in … " - Slowed canonical progress in large fields

Slowed canonical progress in large fields

Webb2 mars 2024 · Abstract We argue that paradigmatic progress may be slowed as scientific fields grow large. This assertion is supported by evidence from citation patterns across … Webb6 mars 2024 · Read “Publish, Don’t Perish: Recommendations for Mitigating Impacts of the New Federal Open Access Policy ” an Op-Ed from Volume 22, Issue 01 of the Journal of Science Policy & Governance.

Did you know?

Webb5 okt. 2024 · Their new paper for the Oct. 12, 2024 issue of PNAS is titled, “Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science.” In it, they make the case that Big Science is becoming hardened (i.e., ossified) by consensus that it is hindering the ability for open-minded researchers to debate prevailing views and offer new ideas. Webb13 okt. 2024 · Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Paper by Johan S. G. Chu and James A. Evans: “The size of scientific fields may impede the rise of new ideas. Examining 1.8 billion citations among 90 million papers across 241 subjects, we find a deluge of papers does not lead to turnover of central ideas in a field, but rather to ...

WebbSlowed canonical progress in large fields of science (PNAS/ Johan S. G. Chu & James A. Evans) Paper: "Examining 1.8 billion citations among 90 million papers across 241 subjects, we find a deluge of papers does not lead to turnover of central ideas in a field, but rather to ossification of canon. Webb13 okt. 2024 · 近日，美國著名SCI期刊PNAS刊登文章《Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science》指出，在科學研究領域，“同質化”論文的大規模生產可能會阻礙新興思想的出現。

Webb5 mars 2024 · Show search field. Show menu. Search. Performing search. Data not shown – Scientific publishing is broken; Data not shown – Scientific publishing is broken 5 March, 2024 . 9 min read > This is the final piece of my 3-part series on Decentralized Science. ... Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Webb13 okt. 2024 · 摘要. 近日，美國著名SCI期刊PNAS刊登文章《Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science》指出，在科學研究領域，“同質化”論文的大規模生產可能會阻礙新興思想的出現。

WebbSlowed canonical progress in large fields of science. JSG Chu, JA Evans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (41), e2024636118, 2024. 141: 2024: A simple explanation for taxon abundance patterns. J Chu, C Adami. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96 (26), 15017-15019, 1999. 40:

Webb8 okt. 2024 · These findings suggest that the progress of large scientific fields may be slowed, trapped in existing canon. Policy measures shifting how scientific work is … devin bush hudlWebb12 dec. 2024 · 论文题目为 Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science，发表在著名期刊 PNAS 上。他们认为，新发表论文的泛滥，造成许多新想法之间的竞争，可能会阻碍科研人员聚焦于一个有希望的想法的集中力，使得围绕它的研究难以有效积累。论文还展示了一系列支持该理论预测的数据：当一个科学领域每年发表的论文数量增加时，被引用 … churchill contents insuranceWebb12 okt. 2024 · 有人说：“量变可引起质变”，即多发表论文，自然会提升科研质量。果真如此吗？近日，在 PNAS 上发表的一篇文章《 Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science 》，对上述量变-质变问题给出了充分的科学依据，引起了大家的关注。. 这篇文章通过定量分析 241 门细分学科的 9000 万篇论文的 18 亿次 ... churchill contract catering limitedWebbWe argue that paradigmatic progress may be slowed as scientific fields grow large. This assertion is supported by evidence from citation patterns across 251 fields—over 1 … churchill container llcWebb12 okt. 2024 · These findings suggest that the progress of large scientific fields may be slowed, trapped in existing canon. Policy measures shifting how scientific work is … devin bush lbWebbThe bottom 50% least-cited papers in contrast decreased in share as the field grew larger, dropping from garnering 43.7% of citations at 10,000 papers to slightly above 20% at … churchill contract cleanersWebb22 mars 2024 · This article caught my eye not only due to its obviously stunning implications, but also because someone wrote me several weeks ago saying that some of my ideas in foresight - though I’m always ... devin bush madden rating